United States v. Lester Genser and Lawrence Forman
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SEITZ, Chief Judge.
In this aspect of these appeals we must examine the substantive and procedural implications of the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. LaSalle National Bank, 437 U.S. 298, 98 S.Ct. 2357, 57 L.Ed.2d 221 (1978), which described the limits of the Internal Revenue Service’s authority to issue civil summonses under 26 U.S.C. § 7602. Defendants Lester Genser and Lawrence Forman appealed from their convictions for tax evasion. In an earlier opinion we rejected various challenges to those convictions but retained jurisdiction and remanded the case to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Donaldson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. LaSalle National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Reisman v. CaplinSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. Lester Genser and Lawrence FormanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Chemical BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- United States v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. KisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Peter J. Serubo, Donald H. Brown, United States of America v. W. Thomas Plachter, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- State v. BenoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- United States v. Garden State National BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.