Legal Opinion

United States v. Lester Genser and Lawrence Forman

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 9, 1979No. 76-2623, 76-2624PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

SEITZ, Chief Judge.

In this aspect of these appeals we must examine the substantive and procedural implications of the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. LaSalle National Bank, 437 U.S. 298, 98 S.Ct. 2357, 57 L.Ed.2d 221 (1978), which described the limits of the Internal Revenue Service’s authority to issue civil summonses under 26 U.S.C. § 7602. Defendants Lester Genser and Lawrence Forman appealed from their convictions for tax evasion. In an earlier opinion we rejected various challenges to those convictions but retained jurisdiction and remanded the case to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Donaldson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. United States v. LaSalle National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Reisman v. CaplinSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. United States v. Lester Genser and Lawrence FormanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
  5. United States v. Chemical BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. United States v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  2. United States v. KisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
  3. United States v. Peter J. Serubo, Donald H. Brown, United States of America v. W. Thomas Plachter, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
  4. State v. BenoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  5. United States v. Garden State National BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API