Legal Opinion

McNeilab, Inc. v. Scandipharm, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 6, 1994No. 92-7403PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM and ORDER

SHAPIRO, District Judge.

Plaintiff MeNeilab, Inc. (“McNeil”) brought this action for patent infringement against defendant Scandipharm, Inc. (“Scandipharm”) under the Patent Laws of the United States, Title 35 United States Code. Presently before the court is defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. Because the undisputed material facts show that plaintiff lacks standing to maintain this action, defendant’s motion will be granted.

I. BACKGROUND

McNeil is a Pennsylvania corporation with its principal place of business in Pennsylvania. BASF Aktiengesellschaft (“BASF”), a German…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Williams v. Borough of West ChesterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  4. Waterman v. MacKenzieSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  5. Vera L. POLLOCK, Appellant, v. AMERICAN TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH LONG LINESCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Penril Datacomm Networks, Inc. v. Rockwell International Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API