Legal Opinion

McIntosh v. Vail

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1943No. 9471PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Riley, PResident:

By this bill in the nature of an interpleader, brought by F. F. McIntosh and E. W. Grimm, partners doing business as McIntosh and Grimm, in the Circuit Court of Jackson County, plaintiffs sought the determination to which of two groups of claimants certain gas royalties belong. The salient issue is whether language used in the deed of conveyance by Mary E. Clerc created a covenant real or one merely personal. The effect of the decree of the circuit court being to adjudicate it a covenant real, appellants (the administrator and heirs of J. M. Stone, deceased) seek a reversal…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Paxton v. Benedum-Trees Oil Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Toothman v. CourtneyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1907
  3. West Virginia Transportation Co. v. Ohio River Pipe Line Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Steel v. American Oil Development Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Hurxthal v. Boom Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1903

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Davis v. HardmanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. United Fuel Gas Company v. BattleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Simson v. LangholfSupreme Court of Colorado · 1956
  4. McCall v. NettlesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  5. Collins v. StalnakerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1948

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API