Legal Opinion
In re Muller
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 10, 1997PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Respondent Roger S. Muller was admitted to the practice of law in the State of New York by the First Judicial Department on June 22, 1992. He is currently employed in a nonlegal posi*297tion that is not contingent upon his continued admission to the Bar.
The notice and statement of charges against respondent alleged that he violated Code of Professional Responsibility DR 1-102 (A) (4) and (8) (22 NYCRR 1200.3) by subjecting a former girlfriend to numerous harassing telephone calls over a period of time and by posing as a law clerk of a Federal court Judge in order to harass his…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- In re SchiffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- In re SteinbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
4Cited by8 opinions
- In re KahnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re ChiofaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- In re SantanaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- In re ArkunAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- In re ArkunAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.