In re Santana
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Respondent was admitted to the New York Bar at the Second Judicial Department in 1992, and has maintained an office for *52such practice within the First Department at all relevant times since then. In 1995 he was found guilty, after jury trial, of harassment in the second degree (a violation), and two counts of falsely reporting an incident in the third degree (a class B misdemeanor), and was sentenced to a one-year period of conditional discharge, 43 days of intermittent imprisonment, and a fine of $90. Respondent failed to report this conviction to the Appellate Division,…
3Cases cited1 opinion
- In re MullerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
4Cited by2 opinions
- In re SantanaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Matter of PerryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025