Legal Opinion
Fairbanks North Star Borough v. Kandik Construction, Inc. & Associates
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided April 17, 1990No. S-2772PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BURKE, Justice.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
The Fairbanks North Star Borough contracted with Roen Design Associates, Inc. (Roen) to prepare an environmental assessment, a feasibility study and the initial plans for the Cripple Creek II subdivision near the City of Fairbanks. See Fairbanks N. Star Borough v. Roen Design Assocs., 727 P.2d 758, 758-59 (Alaska 1986). In a second contract, Roen agreed to survey and design roads for the subdivision. Id. at 759. Based on Roen’s plans and specifications, the Borough solicited bids for construction of the roads.
The construction contract…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- James A. Boyajian, Assignee of Triumph Manufacturing Company, Bankrupt v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
- Mitford v. De LasalaAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
- Poulin v. ZartmanAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
- Souza & McCue Construction Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Power Constructors, Inc. v. Taylor & HintzeAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
- Conam Alaska v. Bell Lavalin, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1992
- City of Kenai v. BurnettAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
- Savage Arms, Inc. v. Western Auto Supply Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001
- Geolar, Inc. v. Gilbert/Commonwealth Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1994
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.