Legal Opinion

Cook v. Cook

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided November 21, 2003No. 90,176PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Brazil, J.:

Michael Cook appeals the denial of his motion to dismiss the negligence action filed by his wife, Noreen Cook. He contends the court erred by denying his motion because the action was barred by the statute of limitations.

We agree and reverse.

Noreen incurred injuries as a passenger in a vehicle driven by Michael on March 14, 2000. On March 7, 2002, she filed a petition seeking damages.in excess of $75,000, alleging that Michael’s negligence caused the accident resulting in her injuries. On May 30, 2002, the petition, interrogatories, and request for production of documents were sent…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Lindenman v. UmscheidSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
  2. Williamson v. City of HaysSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  3. Jenkins v. City of TopekaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  4. State Ex Rel. Stephan v. Kansas House of RepresentativesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  5. Slayden v. SixtaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Burnham v. Humphrey Hospitality Reit Trust, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  2. Blackmon v. U.S.D. 259 School DistrictDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2011
  3. Spiess v. MeyersDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2007
  4. Fisher v. DeCarvalhoCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2011
  5. LE v. JoslinCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API