Legal Opinion

Anthony Rutledge v. Seyfarth, Shaw, Fairweather & Geraldson

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 5, 2000No. 98-15298PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

201 F.3d 1212 (9th Cir. 2000)

ANTHONY RUTLEDGE, an individual on his own behalf and beneficiaries of the Hotel Union and Hotel Industry of Hawaii Pension Trust; AFL HOTEL AND RESTAURANT WORKERS' HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND,Plaintiffs-Appellees, ORDER AND AMENDED

v.

SEYFARTH, SHAW, FAIRWEATHER & GERALDSON, a California Law Partnership; MITCHELL WHITEHEAD, an individual, OPINION Defendants-Appellants.

No. 98-15298

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Argued and Submitted March 9, 1999

Filed January 12, 2000

Amended April 5, 2000

Appeal from the United States District Courtfor the Northern…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. New York State Teamsters Council Health & Hospital Fund v. Centrus Pharmacy SolutionsDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API