Legal Opinion
Pladwell v. Travelers' Insurance
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 13, 1929PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMahoney, J.
The plaintiff seeks to recover on a policy of life insurance issued by defendant upon the life of her husband, who died July 7, 1924. The case was tried before me without a jury, with a stipulation that a verdict was to be directed by the court with the same force and effect as if rendered by a jury. The facts in the case were stipulated. On or about the 13th of September, 1922, defendant issued its certain policy of life insurance upon the life of Arthur B. Pladwell, plaintiff’s husband, whereby it insured him in the sum of two thousand five hundred dollars, in accordance with the terms and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- McMaster v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Wilkie v. New York Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- McCampbell v. New York Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1923
- McConnell v. Provident Savings Life Assur. Soc. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1899
- Methvin v. Fidelity Mutual Life Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lentin v. Continental Assurance Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1952
- New York Life Ins. Co. v. TolbertCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
- Fawcett v. Security Ben. Ass'nUtah Supreme Court · 1940
- Kampf v. Franklin Life InsuranceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
- First National Bank v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.