Montandon v. Cox Broadcasting Corp.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BRAY, J. *
Plaintiff appeals from judgment of the San Francisco Superior Court in favor of defendants.
Question Presented
Defendants are not legally responsible for the libelous changes made to their article by TV Guide.
Record
Plaintiff filed a complaint against Cox Broadcasting Corp., Pat Michaels and others for libel because of the publication in TV Guide of the article hereinafter described, submitted by the above-named defendants, but altered by the publishers of said magazine. Defendants answered the complaint and later moved for directed verdict. The trial court granted the m otion…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Washington Gas Light Co. v. LansdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Draper v. Hellman Commercial Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Montandon v. Triangle Publications, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1975
- Di Giorgio Corp. v. Valley Labor CitizenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Klos v. ZahorikSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lewis v. Time Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 1979
- Mitchell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Montandon v. Triangle Publications, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1975
- Osmond v. Ewap, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1984
- Masson v. New Yorker Magazine, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1993