Legal Opinion
MALIK v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY IMPROPERLY PLEADED AS MET LIFE, INC.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided September 9, 2024No. 2:23-cv-21337Unknown
1Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY TAHIR MALIK, Civil Action No. 23-21337 Plaintiff, v. OPINION METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE September 9, 2024 COMPANY, Defendant. SEMPER, District Judge. The current matter comes before the Court on Metropolitan Life Insurance Company’s (“Defendant” or “MetLife”) Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF 15, “MSJ.”) Tahir Malik (“Plaintiff”) did not oppose the Motion despite an order from the Court instructing Plaintiff to respond to Defendant’s Motion.1 The Court reviewed all submissions and decided the motion without oral argument…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.