Legal Opinion
People v. Corona
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 21, 1965No. Crim. 10380PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFiles, P. J.
Appellant, James Bradley and Richard Smoot were charged by information with possession of heroin in violation of Health and Safety Code section 11500. The superior court appointed separate counsel for each of the three. Each pleaded not guilty and waived a trial by jury. After a court trial, appellant and Bradley were found guilty as charged and Smoot was found not guilty. Corona alone is here appealing from the judgment.
Facts
In stating the case we assume in favor of the judgment the existence of every fact which the trial judge could have deduced from the evidence. (People v. Hills, 30…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- People v. DoradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- In Re SpencerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- People v. LukerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- People v. HillsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. JolkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- People v. ShoalsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- People v. BerryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- In Re RasconCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- People v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.