Legal Opinion

Adams Express Co. v. Haynes

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1866PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Writ of Error to the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. E. S. Williams, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Walker

This was an action of assumpsit brought by Bichard F. Haynes, in the Cook Circuit Court, against the Adams Express company, to recover the value of the contents of a trunk, intrusted to them as common carriers, to transport from Hash-ville, Tennessee, to Chicago, Illinois; and it was claimed that the contents of the trunk were lost through the negligent and fraudulent conduct of the company. The instrument declared on is as follows:

“Adams Express Company,
“ Great Eastern, Western, and Southern Express Forwarders,
“ Hashville, Feb. 10th, 1865.
“ Beceived of B. T. Haynes, 1 Trunk, value , marked ‘…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Illinois Central Railroad v. CopelandIllinois Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Western Transportation Co. v. NewhallIllinois Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Illinois Central Railroad v. MorrisonIllinois Supreme Court · 1857

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Hoadley v. Northern Transportation Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
  2. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. SelbyIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Tyler, Ullman & Co. v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Schaefer v. Washington Safety Deposit Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Field v. Chicago & Rock Island RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1874

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API