Fox v. State

David Spencer Fox filed an application for post-conviction relief alleging he had received ineffective assistance of counsel during his probation violation proceedings. After conducting an evidentiary hearing, the district court concluded Fox had not established that he was entitled to relief and dismissed his application. For the reasons explained below, we affirm.

Facts.

In 1987, Fox was convicted in district court upon his plea of guilty to forgery. He received a suspended sentence of ten years and was placed on supervised probation. Fox was later arrested for violating the terms of his…