Legal Opinion

Cleland v. Walbridge

California Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1889No. 12731PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Siskiyou County. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Hayne, C.

—In this case, the defendant’s demurrer to an amended complaint was sustained. The learned judge filed a document, which is really an opinion and order sustaining the demurrer, but which the parties have called a “judgment.” Subsequently a second amended complaint was filed, and the defendant filed a demurrer thereto. Apparently no action was taken on this demurrer. Nearly three years afterward the plaintiff obtained leave to file a third amended complaint. The defendant moved to strike out this last complaint, and the court granted the motion, and ordered judgment for the defendant,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Swain v. BurnetteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Strathern v. DakinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rose v. Superior Court of Imperial Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927
  2. Long v. LesterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API