Legal Opinion

Jones v. Farquhar

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 30, 1898No. Appeal, No. 475PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal, No. 475, Jan. T., 1897, by plaintiff, from decree of C. P. York Co., on bill in equity. Bill in equity for an account.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 475, Jan. T., 1897, by plaintiff, from decree of C. P. York Co., on bill in equity. Bill in equity for an account. Before Bitteng-er,' P. J. Tbe facts appear by the opinion of the court below which was as follows: ■ ' After considerable correspondence between John A. Jones, since deceased, who was plaintiff in this case, and who was an inventor of drill points, and a successful salesman of agricultural implements, then residing in Wilmington, Del., and A. B. Farquhar, the defendant, residing near the city of York, Pa., and largely engaged in the manufacture of agricultural…

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam,

A careful consideration of the record in this case has not only satisfied us that there is no substantial error in the conclusions reached by the court below, but also that it would serve no useful purpose to consider in detail the several specifications of error on which the appellant relies. We find nothing in either of them that would justify a reversal or modification of the decree. They are all overruled; and, for reasons given by the learned president of the common pleas, the decree is affirmed and the appeal dismissed at appellant’s costs.

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. Palmgreen v. Palmer's Garage, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  2. J. Purdy Cope Hotels Co. v. Fidelity-Phenix Fire InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Stotsenburg v. FrostSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. McCornack v. SharplesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  5. Greenan v. ErnstSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API