Legal Opinion
Johnson v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided April 14, 1925No. 2318PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROSE, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiffs in •error S. K. Johnson and Albert Eiek, hereinafter called the defendants, together with eight other individuals, were indicted for a conspiracy among themselves, and with others unknown, to violate the National Prohibition Act (Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1923, § ÍOISS^ et seq.). Six of the accused pleaded guilty either before the trial began or at various stages of its progress. Two more were acquitted by the jury. The plaintiffs in error were convicted and have brought their case here. ,
Their' assignments of error in form number 24, but in fact, are so…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Counselman v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Heike v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- People v. . SharpNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- United States v. KimballU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1902
- Martin v. StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1924
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- United States v. MoniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. James Hugh RogersCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1961
- Coates v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
- United States v. Association of American RailroadsDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1945
- Olmstead v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.