Legal Opinion

Morrell v. Marshall

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 17, 1985PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McKUSICK, Chief Justice.

Defendant Paul Marshall appeals a judgment entered in Superior Court (Franklin County) after a jury found him liable for the damages suffered by plaintiffs Burc-hell and Virginia Morrell in a collision that occurred between the Marshall and Morrell automobiles in Kingfield on June 6, 1981. We hold that the Superior Court erred in admitting evidence that the state trooper who investigated the accident issued a summons charging Marshall with violating the “failure to yield” statute, 29 M.R.S.A. § 941 (1978), and that the District Court, after adjudicating that Marshall…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. State v. TrueSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  3. Hossler Ex Rel. Dows v. BarrySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  4. State v. MarshallSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hinshaw v. KeithDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1986
  2. In Re Thomas B.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
  3. Teresa D. Needham v. Charles D. NeedhamSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API