Legal Opinion

Whittaker v. Southeastern Greyhound Lines

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided April 28, 1950PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judge Latimer

Affirming in part, reversing in part.

This controversy arose from the granting of a certificate of convenience and necessity by the Division of Motor Transportation to Blue Motor Coach Lines for the operation of a bus line between Louisville and Middletown over U. S. Highway 60, a distance of some seven miles. The granting of the certificate was protested by Southeastern Greyhound Lines, The Louisville Railway Company, and Kentucky Bus Lines, (hereafter designated respectively, “Southeastern,” “Railway,” and “Kentucky Lines”).

At the hearing almost a hundred witnesses testified…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Red Star Transportation Co. v. Red Dot Coach LinesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
  2. Cannonball Transit Co. v. Sparks Bros. Bus Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  3. Consolidated Coach Corp. v. Kentucky River Coach Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  4. Cooper v. McWilliams & RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
  5. Utter v. BlackCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kentucky Utilities Co. v. Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1952
  2. Eck Miller Transfer Co. v. ArmesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1954
  3. Young v. EldridgeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1951
  4. Comprehensive Home Health Services, Inc. v. Professional Home Health Care Agency, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Department of Motor Transp. of Kentucky v. Eck Miller Transfer Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API