Legal Opinion

Liebheit v. Enright

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 8, 1908No. 15,392PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from Wyandotte district court; J. McCabe Moore, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

In a suit by E. A. Enright to quiet his title to a fractional lot in Kansas City, as against Conrad Liebheit and Louise Liebheit, he claimed title *322tb the lot because of adverse possession by himself and predecessors for the statutory period and also under a tax deed recently acquired from another. The court found generally in favor of Enright, and the Liebheits complain of a ruling refusing to require Enright to elect upon which title he would rely.

Enright could not be put to an election, as the two' titles, or rights, under which he…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Anderson v. BurnhamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
  2. Omaha & Florence Land & Trust Co. v. HansenNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Pratt v. ArdSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
  4. Bird v. WhetstoneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gordon v. MunnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  2. Boese v. CraneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  3. Freeman v. FunkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  4. Graham v. LambethCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API