Legal Opinion

Miller v. Weeks

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1891PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from Dickinson District Court. Replevin. Judgment for plaintiff, Weeks, on July 18, 1888. The defendant sheriff, Miller, brings the case here.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Simpson, C.:

In an action brought by the Richards & Conover Hardware Company against Joseph Weeks, an attachment was issued out of the district court of Dickinson county, and Miller, the sheriff, levied the order of attachment upon a certain stock of hardware, together with tinners’ tools and materials, as the property of Weeks. This action in replevin was commenced by Weeks against the sheriff to recover possession of the tinners’ tools and materials, they being claimed as exempt to him by virtue of the eighth subdivision of § 3 of the exemption law. The cause was tried by a jury,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bliss v. VedderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re OetingerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 1985
  2. Federal Agency Investment Co. v. BakerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  3. Davis v. Weddington (In Re Weddington)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2011
  4. Williams v. VincentSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  5. Seel v. WittmanDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API