Routledge v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MEYERS, Justice.
Appellants, Bruce Wayne Routledge, Billy Ray Crawford, and Vivian Nell Hill, appeal from convictions of aggravated possession of a controlled substance, namely amphetamine of more than 400 grams, with intent to deliver. See Tex.Health & Safety Code Ann. § 481.116(d)(2) (Vernon Pamph.1992). Punishment for Routledge was assessed by the jury at fifteen years confinement and a fine of $7,500. Punishment for Crawford was assessed by the jury at fifteen years confinement and a $5,000 fine. Punishment for Hill was assessed by the jury at twenty years confinement and a $7,500…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Alejandro v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Deshong v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
- DeGarmo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Mitchell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Mays v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1995
- Karnes v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1994
- Small v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1998
- Watkins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Reed v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.