Legal Opinion

Routledge v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 4, 1992No. 2-91-204-CR, 2-91-230-CR and 2-91-231-CRPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MEYERS, Justice.

Appellants, Bruce Wayne Routledge, Billy Ray Crawford, and Vivian Nell Hill, appeal from convictions of aggravated possession of a controlled substance, namely amphetamine of more than 400 grams, with intent to deliver. See Tex.Health & Safety Code Ann. § 481.116(d)(2) (Vernon Pamph.1992). Punishment for Routledge was assessed by the jury at fifteen years confinement and a fine of $7,500. Punishment for Crawford was assessed by the jury at fifteen years confinement and a $5,000 fine. Punishment for Hill was assessed by the jury at twenty years confinement and a $7,500…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Alejandro v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
  3. Deshong v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  4. DeGarmo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  5. Mitchell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mays v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1995
  2. Karnes v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1994
  3. Small v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1998
  4. Watkins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1997
  5. Reed v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API