Legal Opinion

Reed v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 10, 1996No. 2-95-128-CR, 2-95-129-CRPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAUPHINOT, Justice.

Appellant Jamal Anton Reed was charged by indictment with aggravated sexual assault with a deadly weapon and aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon. Upon his plea of not guilty, the jury convicted him in each case, and in each case sentenced him to eighty years’ confinement in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. Reed appeals, raising three points of error. He asserts that the trial court erred (1) in permitting the complainant to identify Reed in court by physical description only, (2) in sustaining the State’s objection to Reed’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Romero v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  2. Alvarado v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
  3. Rezac v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  4. Fierro v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  5. Gibbs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Camarillo v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2002
  2. Espinoza v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1997
  3. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1998
  4. Daniel Vadnais v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2015
  5. Espinoza v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API