Legal Opinion

Twentieth Century-Fox Corp. v. Papayanokos

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1957PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHerbert D. Hamm, J.

This is a motion to change the venue of the above-entitled action from the County of New York, which is alleged to be an improper county, to the County of Albany, which admittedly is a proper county.

The plaintiff in response to a demand pursuant to rule 146 of the Rules of Civil Practice for a voluntary change of venue and in opposition to the defendant’s motion set forth only: “ New York County, designated in the summons and complaint as the place of trial, is the proper venue herein ”, In Cohen v. O’Dette (7 Misc 2d 476, 478-479) Justice Hudson stated: “ The affidavits submitted by…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mills & Gibb (Inc.) v. StarinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  2. Linder v. Elmira Ass'n of Commerce, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Shepard & Morse Lumber Co. v. BurleighAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  4. Remington & Sherman Co. v. Niagara County National BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  5. Bennett v. Crawford Bros.New York Supreme Court · 1945

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ludlow Valve Manufacturing Co. v. S. S. Silberblatt, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
  2. Payne v. Civil Service Employees Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API