Legal Opinion

Shepard & Morse Lumber Co. v. Burleigh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1898PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff, the Shepard & Morse Lumber Company, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Hew York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Hew York on the 21st day of December, 1897, changing the place of trial of the action from the county of Hew York to the county of Washington. . ■

1Opinion of the Court

Ingraham, J.:

The action is brought by the plaintiff, a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Maine, against the defendants as copartners, the complaint alleging that the defendants’ principal office is at Whitehall, Washington county, 2ST. Y., to recover the damages sustained by what appears to be the malicious prosecution of civil actions instituted by the defendants against the plaintiff in the Supreme Court, in the said county of Washington. The defendants answered the complaint, and with the answer served a notice demanding that the place of trial be changed from the county…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. . PlattNew York Court of Appeals · 1889

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Prentiss v. GreeneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
  2. Mills & Gibb (Inc.) v. StarinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  3. Republic Motor Truck Co. v. Buda Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Schwartz v. Zim Israel Navigation Co.New York Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Continental Grain Co. v. ChristieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API