Legal Opinion

United States v. Corl

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

Decided January 23, 1979No. NCM 78 0968PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CEDARBURG, Chief Judge:

Contrary to his pleas, appellant was convicted by a general court-martial, composed of officer members, of an unauthorized absence of 26 days and two instances of transfer and sale of phencyclidine in violation of Articles 86 and 92, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 886, 892. He was sentenced to a dishonorable discharge, confinement at hard labor for 2 years, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and reduction to pay grade E-l.

Appellant assigns five alleged errors:

I

FIVE MEMBERS COURTS, AS USED HERE, VIOLATE FIFTH AMEND*915MENT DUE PROCESS AND RESULT IN LACK OF…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Schlesinger v. CouncilmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. O'Callahan v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Ex Parte MilliganSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  5. Ex Parte QuirinSupreme Court of the United States · 1942

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. United States v. VickersUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  2. United States v. DavidsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  3. Sanford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
  4. United States v. RojasU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1983
  5. Mendrano v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API