Legal Opinion

Zepeda v. United States Immigration & Naturalization Service

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 12, 1983No. 80-5464PublishedCited by 530 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALLACE, Circuit Judge:

With increasing frequency, we are requested to pass upon the method used by the Immigration and Naturalization Service (the INS) in its efforts to enforce the immigration laws enacted by Congress. Here, in a case challenging some of its actions, the district court entered a preliminary injunction against the INS and its officers and agents within the Central District of California. The merits of the case present the difficult question whether these officers have violated and will violate constitutional rights of the targets of their investigations. We will not pass on…

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Rizzo v. GoodeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by530 opinions

  1. Mark Baird v. Rob BontaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
  2. Virginia Zepeda v. United States Immigration And Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  3. Fellowship of Christian Athletes v. San Jose Unified School District Board of EducatioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
  4. John Doe 1 v. Donald TrumpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  5. Joe Hunt v. National Broadcasting Company, Inc. Itc Productions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989

525 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API