Legal Opinion

In Re Pincelli

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 10, 2007No. 26400PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC) and respondent have entered into an Agreement for Discipline by Consent pursuant to Rule 21, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR, in which respondent admits misconduct and agrees to either an admonition or a public reprimand. We accept the agreement and issue a public reprimand. The facts, as set forth in the agreement, are as follows.

FACTS

In the spring of 2003, respondent created an entity known as “Sandlapper Legal Services, LLC” (Sandlapper) which operated out of respondent’s law firm offices under his supervision and direction. While Sandlapper was described as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. Buyers Service Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  2. Doe v. McMasterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  3. Doe Law Firm v. RichardsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  4. Doe v. CondonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re PincelliSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API