Mary Doe v. Robert M. Coupe
Court of Chancery of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MONTGOMERY-REEVES, Vice Chancellor.
In this action, three convicted sex offenders challenge the,constitutionality of a Delaware statute that requires them to wear GPS monitors on their ankles at all times as a condition of their parole or probation. The plaintiffs are Tier III sex offenders, which means they were convicted of the sex crimes that the Delaware General Assembly has deemed among the most serious. The challenged statute — 11 Del. C. § 4121(u) (“Section ’4121(u)”)— mandates GPS monitoring .of all Tier III sex offenders granted parole or probation without, reference to their…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Griffin v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Vernonia School District 47J v. ActonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Commonwealth v. FelizMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2019