Legal Opinion

Mercantile National Bank of Chicago v. Wismer

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided September 16, 1965PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant seasonably objected to the absence from the plaintiff’s affidavit in support of its motion for summary judgment, sworn to in the State of Illinois, of the authenticating certificate prescribed by CPLR 2309 (subd. [c]). Though the defect could have been cured by amendment, it was not so cured; the affidavit was, therefore, not properly before the court (Majestic Co. v. Wender, 24 Misc 2d 1018).

While CPLR 3213 permits a plaintiff to serve with the summons a notice of motion for summary judgment and the supporting papers in lieu of a complaint, in an action upon a judgment or…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gribbon v. . FreelNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  2. Barth v. OwensCity of New York Municipal Court · 1942
  3. Creative Woodworking Co. v. BohnCivil Court of the City of New York · 1964
  4. Majestic Co. v. WenderNew York Supreme Court · 1960

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Flushing National Bank v. Brightside ManufacturiIng Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Elizabeth R.E. v. Doundley A.E.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API