Legal Opinion

Flushing National Bank v. Brightside ManufacturiIng Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 1969PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDaniel E. Fitzpatrick, J.

Motion for summary judgment pursuant to CPLB 3213 in favor of plaintiff and against the defendants, in the sum of $12,000, together with the costs and disbursements of this action, on the ground that this action is based upon instruments for the payment of money only and that there is no defense thereto.

The first question to be resolved is that of the traverse of the service of the summons and moving papers herein upon the corporate and individual defendants. Upon the hearing on January 10, 1969, it was conceded that the two individual defendants Estelle T. Fliegler and Marilyn Barker were…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. National Exchange Bank v. LesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
  2. Cooper v. DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
  3. Barth v. OwensCity of New York Municipal Court · 1942
  4. Mercantile National Bank of Chicago v. WismerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1965
  5. Polak v. AnonymousAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kemp v. HinksonSuffolk County District Court · 1973
  2. Plaza 400 Owners Corp. v. ResnicoffCivil Court of the City of New York · 1996
  3. Putnam County National Bank v. BischofsbergerNew York County Court, Putnam County · 1975
  4. Goldstein v. SaltzmanNew York Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Imbriano v. SeamanNassau County District Court · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API