Legal Opinion

Michael v. Mills

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 15, 1896PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Error to the District Court of Park County.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Campbell

This is an action in support of an adverse claim filed by plaintiff in error as plaintiff below, and was brought to try the possessory right and title to the ground in conflict between the Rogers lode claim, owned by the plaintiff, and the W. H, dVL, Harold and Arthur lode claims, owned by the defendants,

There was a trial before a jury, which found that the defendants were entitled to the possession of the ground in controversy, upon which the court entered judgment in favor of the defendants, to reverse which the plaintiff brings his writ of error to this court.

Ten assignments of error are…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. LowerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1882
  2. Becker v. PughSupreme Court of Colorado · 1886

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Seaton Mountain Electric Light, Heat & Power Co. v. Idaho Springs Investment Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1910
  2. Booren v. McWilliamsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Doll v. StewartSupreme Court of Colorado · 1902
  4. Erbaugh v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1914
  5. Mountz v. AptSupreme Court of Colorado · 1911

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API