Legal Opinion

Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Holder

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided June 12, 1981No. FILE NO. 978PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.

In this case we are called upon to determine the constitutionality, on equal protection grounds, of the statutory scheme created by General Statutes § 38-325 (b) and (c). 2 The plaintiff sued for reimbursement of basic reparations benefits paid by it to the defendant who thereafter settled a claim against a third-party tortfeasor. The court below held that the statutory scheme violates both the federal and state equal protection clauses, 3 and rendered summary judgment for the plaintiff in an amount which deducted from the plaintiff’s recovery a portion of the attorney’s fee paid by the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. Shavers v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Silver v. SilverSupreme Court of the United States · 1929

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Warner v. Leslie-Elliott Constructors, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  2. Shelby Mutual Insurance v. GhelfaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
  3. Amica Mutual Insurance v. BartonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1983
  4. Koskoff, Koskoff & Bieder v. Allstate Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  5. Dugas v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API