Legal Opinion

Riley v. The Richmond

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided September 26, 1894No. 110PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Libel by D. Eiley and another against the steam tug E. Heipershausen and the steamship Eichmond for collision. There was a decree for libelant against both vessels. 56 Fed. 619. The owners of the tug and steamship appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

WALLACE, Circuit Judge.

The steamship Eichmond and the steam tug Heipershausen were both adjudged in fault by the district court, and condemned to pay the libelants- damages for the injuries inflicted upon the canal boat Thomas Elood and her cargo by the collision between the steamship and the canal boat. Both the owners of the steamship and of the tug have appealed, and each appellant assigns as error that the vessel of the other should have been found solely in fault by the district court. The collision took place about 9 o’clock in the evening of June 10, 1892, under the following…

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. Atlas S. S. Co. v. The BourgogneDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1896
  2. Cuyamel Fruit Co. v. NedlandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1927
  3. The TungusCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
  4. The EuropeDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1909
  5. Getty Oil Co. (Eastern Operations), Inc. v. SS Ponce De LeonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API