Legal Opinion
United States v. Hsia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 10, 1998No. Crim. 98-0057(PLF)PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
This ease is before the Court on defendant’s Motion No. 1 (to Dismiss the Indictment for Violation of Due Process), Motion No. 2 (to Dismiss Counts in the Indictment for Their Positive Repugnance to the Federal Election Campaign Act), Motion No. 3 (to Dismiss Count 1 of the Indictment for Failure to State an Offense), Motion No. 5 (to Dismiss Counts 2 through 6 for Failure to State an Offense (Causation)), Motion No. 6 (to Dismiss Counts 2 through 6 for Failure to State an Offense (False Statements)), Motion No. 7 (to Dismiss Count 4 and 5 for Failure…
2Cases cited69 opinions
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. Hsia, MariaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
- United States v. KanchanalakCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
- United States v. TrieDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
- United States v. KanchanalakDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1999
- United States v. HsiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.