Legal Opinion

United States v. Kanchanalak

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided October 8, 1999No. 99-3019 & 99-3034PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge WALD.

WALD, Circuit Judge:

The government charged Pornpimol “Pauline” Kanchanalak (aka Pornpimol Parichattkul) and Duangnet “Georgie” Kronenberg with a scheme to disguise illegal hard money contributions and soft money donations from foreign nationals and corporations to national and state political committees. Defendants were also alleged to have caused political committees to file reports with the Federal Election Commission (“FEC”) falsely identifying lawful permanent residents as the source of funds that actually originated with foreign nationals…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. United States v. LanierSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. United States v. HarrissSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  5. Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare v. DavenportSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Guedes v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, FirearmsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
  2. Amer Fed Labor v. FECCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
  3. In Re SEALED CASECourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
  4. American Federation of Labor & Congress of Industrial Organizations v. Federal Election CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
  5. United States v. Warren L. PindellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API