Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Harmon v. Murphy

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 30, 1924No. 6 Div. 190PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.

The petition charges that the Court of Domestic Relations Act of September 28, 1923 (Gen. Sess. Acts 1923, pp. 612-625), under which the respondent Murphy claims to he exercising the powers and performing the duties of a judge of such a court for Jefferson county, is invalid because it violates in numerous particulars the provisions of section 45 of the Constitution. The grounds of invalidity relied upon may be thus condensed and restated:(1) The title and body of the act contain two subjects.(2), The body of the act contains matter not expressed in its title.(3) Section 3 of the act…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ex parte PollardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1866
  2. State v. RogersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
  3. State ex rel. Collman v. PittsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  4. State ex rel. Clarke v. CarterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  5. Ferguson v. Commissioners' CourtSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ward v. State Ex Rel. LeaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  2. State Ex Rel. Austin v. BlackSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  3. State v. SkinnerAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
  4. State v. BurchfieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  5. Swindle v. State Ex Rel. PruittSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API