Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Gwilliams

The appellees in this case have recovered judgments for a second time against appellant for damages to compensate injuries and suffering occasioned them by eating tainted and impure food which it was alleged appellant had negligently sold. The first judgments in which damages were recovered were reversed in an opinion appearing in 189 Ark. 1037 et seq., 76 S. W. (2d) 65. The testimony offered at the first' trial is fully recited in the former opinion, and we said it was insufficient' to support the verdicts because its effect was to show only that the- plaintiffs Avere made sick by eating…