Griffin v. Central Sprinkler Corp.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the CourtBender, J.
¶ 1 This is an appeal from an order granting summary judgment in favor of Appellees. Appellants set forth three questions in their statement of questions involved. For purposes of clarification, we restate the two issues relevant to our review as follows: (1) where Appellant’s praecipe for writ of summons was timestamped at 8:31 a.m. the day after the statute of limitations expired, was summary judgment properly granted based upon the defense of limitations; (2) did/ does the principle or res judicata apply to render decided the statute of limitations question where Appellants did not file an…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Balent v. City of Wilkes-BarreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Criss v. WiseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Washington v. BaxterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Selective Way Insurance v. Hospitality Group Services, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Amicone v. RokSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Nagy v. Best Home Services, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Commonwealth v. KearnsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Cogley v. DuncanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.