Legal Opinion · Dissent

Abercrombie v. State

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1967No. 9817Published

1Dissent

SPEAR, Justice.

I dissent.

While I agree with the majority opinion that the constitutional and statutory provisions together with the state and federal decisions cited therein require a trial judge in Idaho to inform any defendant charged with a felony violation of his right to counsel before being arraigned and to assign counsel to defend such defendant when he desires to have counsel and arrange for payment of the attorney’s fees at the expense of the county; and while I also agree that in most cases it would be well for any trial judge to take an additional ten or fifteen minutes to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Carnley v. CochranSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Rice v. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. In Re JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  5. In re WoodsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API