Legal Opinion

MATTHEWS TRUCKING CO. v. Smith

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1984No. C-2870PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGEE, Justice.

The crux of this personal injury case is whether the correct defendant was named. There are two entities with similar names. Matthews-Lufkin, Inc., d/b/a Matthews Trucking Company is the correct defendant. Matthews Trucking Company, Inc., d/b/a Louisiana-Matthews Trucking Company, Inc., was the entity named as defendant in plaintiffs petition.

The trial court granted a motion for summary judgment in favor of Matthews-Luf-kin, Inc., d/b/a Matthews Trucking Company because it was not sued within two years from the date of the accident. Tex. Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 5526 (Vernon…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Baker v. GoldsmithTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Teer v. DuddlestenTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Gentry v. Credit Plan Corporation of HoustonTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Petro-Chemical Transport, Inc. v. CarrollTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Hanks v. RosserTexas Supreme Court · 1964

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Enserch Corp. v. ParkerTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Palmer v. Enserch Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1987
  3. Nowotny v. L & B Contract Industries, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Cross, Kieschnick & Co. v. Johnston, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1994
  5. Rios v. Northwestern Steel and Wire Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1998

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API