Legal Opinion
Loegering Mfg., Inc. v. Grouser Products, Inc.
District Court, D. North Dakota
Decided August 6, 2004No. A3-02-08PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ERICKSON, District Judge.
Before the Court is Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (doc. #59), Defendants’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (doc. # 86), and Plaintiffs Motion to Dismiss Defendant Grouser (doc. # 121). The Court held a hearing on July 8, 2004.
SUMMARY OF HOLDING
The patentee is not entitled to a patent if he or she did not invent the subject matter. George Loegering (George), Marilyn Loegering (Marilyn), and Louis Keller (Keller) all testified that George invented the subject matter at issue and also communicated this invention to Ronald…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Amf Incorporated, a Corporation v. Sleekcraft Boats, a Sole Proprietorship, and Bruce E. Nescher, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Manville Sales Corporation, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Paramount Systems, Inc., Robert S. Butterworth and Anthony J. DisimoneCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Pfaff v. Wells Electronics, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Richard C. Price v. Dale R. SymsekCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Fair Isaac Corp. v. Experian Information Solutions Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2009