Legal Opinion

Heinzman v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided December 7, 1929No. A-6948PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, P. J.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the district court of Oklahoma county on a charge of having the illegal possession of narcotics, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $500.

The record discloses that at the time charged John Davis, a police officer of Oklahoma City, approached defendant where he was sitting in a barber shop and said to him, “Get up, Heinzman, I want you,” and as defendant arose the officer reached into his shirt pocket and took out a jar of opium. The record further discloses that just a few minutes before this Davis had been informed that…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. DurfeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  2. State v. . McAfeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  3. Gaines v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Roberson v. United StatesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
  5. Tiner v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1875

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Suhay v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938
  2. State v. ChronisterCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1960
  3. Wafers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1968
  4. Hargus v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Tomlin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API