Legal Opinion

State v. Chronister

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided June 21, 1960No. A-12845PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRETT, Judge.

This is an appeal by the State of Oklahoma upon a reserved question of law based upon the action of the District Court of Pontotoc County, Oklahoma, in sustaining the defendant’s motion to suppress the evidence and in dismissing the prosecution.

Briefly, the facts upon which the appeal is predicated are as hereinafter related. The defendant R. L. Chronister and his accomplice, Wilbur Brian (both known to be police characters by arresting officers, French and Kroth) about midnight on March 9, 1959, were observed in the vicinity of Steffen’s Ice Cream plant carrying a “tow” sack…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. People v. SimonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. People v. BlodgettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. People v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. People v. WestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  2. Stidham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1973
  3. Castleberry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1974
  4. Application of BaggettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
  5. Castellano v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1978

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API