Legal Opinion

Grant Street

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 25, 1901No. Appeal, No. 184PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal, No. 184, April T., 1901, by-borough of Turtle Creek, from order of C. P. No. 1, Allegheny Co., June T., 1899, No. 428, sustaining exceptions to report of viewers in In re Sewer on Grant Street and Maple Avenue in Turtle Creek Borough. Exceptions to report of viewers. The facts appear by the opinion of the Superior Court. Error assigned was in sustaining exceptions to report of viewers.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rice, P. J.,

The 8 th section of the Act of May 16, 1891, P. L. 75, under which these proceedings were had provides as follows: “ On petition, viewers shall be appointed as provided in the first section of this act, who shall assess the costs and expenses of the sewer, or grading, paving, curbing, macadamizing, or other improvement of each street or alley upon the property benefited according to benefits, if sufficient can be found, but if not, then the deficiency when finally ascertained shall be paid by the municipal corporation,” etc. Upon the petition of abutting property owners,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Morewood AvenueSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  2. Park Avenue SewersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  3. Witman v. City of ReadingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  4. Fifty-fourth StreetSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
  5. In re the Opening of Orkney StreetSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. West Liberty Avenue SewerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API