Legal Opinion

People v. Kim

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 28, 1996PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Legally sufficient proof of "physical injury” (Penal Law § 10.00 [9]) was adduced by the victim’s testimony that, as a result of the incident, he sustained scrapes to his hip, knee, hand, and arm, throbbing pain in his head and neck, pain in his foot, dizziness, rise in blood pressure and continued to have pain in his hip, leg and knee for two or three days (see, People v DeChamps, 219 AD2d 485, lv denied 86 NY2d 841). Defendant’s claim that the prosecutor improperly used three hypotheticals in summation is unpreserved as a matter of law, since defendant did not object to two of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. GallowayNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. People v. FarrarNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. People v. LovelloNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
  4. People v. RobertsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  5. People v. DeChampsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. SylvesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. People v. WigginsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. People v. GuzmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API