Legal Opinion

Sheasgreen Holding Co. v. Dworsky

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 27, 1930No. 27,934PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.

Defendant appealed from a judgment adjudging void a mortgage foreclosure sale.

Defendant, being the assignee of a second mortgage, caused it to be foreclosed by advertisement. At the foreclosure sale defendant purchased the property for $9,500. The failure to record the power of attorney authorizing the attorney to foreclose the mortgage until the day following the sale is the ground upon -which plaintiff, the owner of the mortgaged premises, seeks to invalidate the sale.

G. S. 1928 (2 Mason, 1927) § 9606, reads:

“Whenever an attorney at law is employed to conduct such foreclosure, his authority…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. First National Bank of St. Paul v. RamierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  2. Greenwich Contracting Co. v. Bonwit Construction Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
  3. Partipilo v. HallmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  4. Whitley v. IrwinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
  5. Gerdin v. Princeton State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API