Legal Opinion
Partipilo v. Hallman
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided May 28, 1987No. 86-1519PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Jiganti
As the result of an error of the Cook County assessor’s office, certain improvements located on the property of the defendant, Elmer J. Hallman, were assessed as part of the adjoining property of the plaintiff, Frank Partipilo. Before discovering the error, Partipilo paid $26,467.10 in real estate taxes which should have been assessed against Hallman. Partipilo then brought this action to recover the amount of the overassessment on the theory of unjust enrichment. On cross-motions for summary judgment, the trial court entered a money judgment in favor of Partipilo. Hallman appeals, contending…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Board of Highway Commissioners v. City of BloomingtonIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
- First National Bank of St. Paul v. RamierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Edens View Realty & Investment, Inc. v. Heritage Enterprises, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980
- Dickerson Realtors, Inc. v. FrewertAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
- Sheasgreen Holding Co. v. DworskySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
3Cited by36 opinions
- Sundance Homes, Inc. v. County of Du PageIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
- 4934, Inc. v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Jordan Keys & Jessamy, LLP v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- Hayes Mechanical, Inc. v. First Industrial, L.P.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2004
- Midcoast Aviation, Inc. v. General Electric Credit Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.