Legal Opinion

State v. Crandell

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 7, 2010No. COA10-439PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEELMAN, Judge.

Where the State introduced substantial evidence that defendant fired the shot that killed Derek Morris and that defendant acted with malice, premeditation and deliberation, the trial court properly denied defendant’s motion to dismiss the charge of first-degree murder. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in allowing Detective Rothrock to give lay opinion testimony pursuant to Rule 701 of the North Carolina Rules of Evidence concerning the calibers of bullets recovered at the crime scene. The trial court did not commit plain error in allowing Special Agent Tanner to…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. State v. OdomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Howerton v. Arai Helmet, Ltd.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  4. State v. BraxtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  5. State v. FaustSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. TrogdonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  2. State v. GarciaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  3. State v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  4. State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API