Legal Opinion
NORTON v. UNITED STATES (In Re NORTON)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho
Decided July 14, 1993No. 19-40180PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
JIM D. PAPPAS, Bankruptcy Judge.
Before the Court is the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant United States of America. After a review of the record and briefing, there are no genuine issues of material fact, only questions of law, and therefore summary judgment is appropriate. F.R.B.P. 7056.
FACTS.
The material facts viewed in a light most favorable to Plaintiffs can be stated briefly. Plaintiff Debtor John Norton was a general partner of Best Care and Associates (hereinafter “Best Care”), a Utah partnership. Best Care failed to pay in full its federal…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re John Arthur Rosenow v. State of Illinois, Department of Revenue, in Re Robert M. Hull v. State of Illinois, Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- In Re Darrel v. Shank, Debtor. Darrel v. Shank v. Washington State Department of Revenue, Excise Tax Division, DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- American Bicycle Ass'n v. United States (In re American Bicycle Ass'n)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- George v. California State Board of Equalization (In Re George)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States Ex Rel. Internal Revenue Service v. Stanmock, Inc. (In Re Stanmock, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. Daniel A. Wright and Lois W. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- State Board of Equalization v. Leal (In Re Leal)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2007